Effect of coadministration of 10 mg/kg calcium chloride and neostigmine on extubation time: A randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Some studies investigating the effect of calcium on neostigmine-induced recovery of neuromuscular blockade have shown that this combination promotes neuromuscular recovery, but does not significantly affect the incidence of postoperative residual curarization and time to extubation. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of 10 mg/kg calcium chloride co-administered with neostigmine on early recovery and time to extubation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study included 88 ASA I-II patients aged between 18 and 65 years who were scheduled for elective surgery lasting at least 1 h under general anaesthesia in which 10 mg/kg of calcium chloride or the same volume of normal saline was co-administered with 5 µg/kg of neostigmine at the end of surgery. Time to extubation (time from neostigmine administration to extubation), time from neostigmine administration to TOF ratio (TOFr) 0.9 (neuromuscular recovery), and the incidence of residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB) and other adverse effects were recorded. RESULTS: Median (Q1, Q3) extubation time was significantly shorter in the calcium group vs. the placebo group (6.5 min [5.52-7.43] vs. 9.78 min [8.35-11]), P < .001. Median neuromuscular recovery time in the calcium group was 5 min vs. 7.1 min in the placebo group, P < .001. Patients in the calcium group had significantly higher TOFr and lower incidence of RNMB at 5 and 10 min vs. the placebo group, and no significant side effects. CONCLUSION: Calcium chloride at a dose of 10 mg/kg co-administered with neostigmine promotes early neuromuscular recovery and reduces time to extubation by about 32%.

Comparación de ibuprofeno y ketorolaco intravenosos para analgesia postoperatoria en niños tratados mediante cirugía de la zona inferior del abdomen: estudio aleatorizado, controlado y de no inferioridad / Comparison of intravenous ibuprofen versus ketorolac for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing lower abdominal surgery: A randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study

Antecedentes: A menudo se utilizan antiinflamatorios no esteroideos para analgesia multimodal, para controlar el dolor postoperatorio. El objetivo de este estudio aleatorizado, controlado, doble ciego y de no inferioridad fue comparar los efectos analgésicos postoperatorios de ibuprofeno y ketorolaco intravenosos en niños tratados mediante cirugía unilateral abierta de la zona inferior del abdomen. Los autores supusieron que la analgesia postoperatoria producida por ibuprofeno intravenoso no sería inferior a la de ketorolaco intravenoso. Métodos: Sesenta y seisniños de 2 a 8 años de edad fueron programados para cirugía unilateral de la zona inferior del abdomen. Los pacientes del grupo ibuprofeno recibieron 10mg/kg/6h de ibuprofeno intravenoso y los pacientes del grupo ketorolaco recibieron 0,5mg/kg/6h de ketorolaco por vía intravenosa. La medida del objetivo primario fue el consumo morfina postoperatoria durante 24h. Las medidas del resultado secundario fueron la puntuación del dolor postoperatorio, la incidencia de fiebre postoperatoria temprana y la incidencia de efectos adversos relativos a ibuprofeno y ketorolaco incluyendo dolor durante la infusión del fármaco, vómitos, dolor epigástrico y reacción alérgica. Resultados: Cincuenta y nuevepacientes completaron el estudio (30 de ibuprofeno y 29 de ketorolaco). No se produjo diferencia significativa (p=0,305) en cuanto a consumo medio (desviación estándar) de morfina postoperatoria durante 24h (μ/kg) entre el grupo ibuprofeno, 160 (5,31), y el grupo ketorolaco, 14,65 (4,61). Las puntuaciones de dolor reportadas fueron similares en ambos grupos. La incidencia de fiebre postoperatoria fue significativamente menor (p=0,039) en el grupo ibuprofeno (3%) que en el grupo ketorolaco (20%). La incidencia de efectos adversos fue similar en ambos grupos.(AU)

Background: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are often used as part of multimodal analgesia to control postoperative pain. This randomized, controlled, double-blinded, non-inferiority study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of intravenous ibuprofen versus ketorolac in children undergoing open unilateral lower abdominal surgery. The authors hypothesized that postoperative analgesia produced by intravenous ibuprofen would be non-inferior to that of intravenous ketorolac. Methods: Sixty-six children aged 2 to 8 years who were scheduled to undergo unilateral lower abdominal surgery, were recruited. Patients in the ibuprofen group received 10mg/kg/6h intravenous ibuprofen. Patients in the ketorolac group were given 0.5mg/kg/6h intravenous ketorolac. The primary outcome measure was 24-h postoperative morphine consumption. The secondary outcome measures were postoperative pain score, the incidence of early postoperative fever and the incidence of ibuprofen and ketorolac adverse effects including pain during drug infusion, vomiting, epigastric pain and allergic reaction. Results: Fifty-nine patients completed the study (30 ibuprofen, 29 ketorolac). There was no significant difference (P=.305) in the mean (SD) 24-h postoperative morphine consumption (μ/kg) between intravenous ibuprofen, 16.00 (5.31), and ketorolac, 14.65 (4.61). The reported pain scores were similar in both groups. The incidence of postoperative fever was significantly lower (p=0.039) in the ibuprofen group (3%) than the ketorolac group (20%). The incidence of adverse effects was similar in both ibuprofen and ketorolac groups. Conclusions: Intravenous ibuprofen can be used as an alternative to ketorolac for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing unilateral lower abdominal surgery because both drugs similarly provide safe and effective postoperative analgesia.(AU)

Comparison of intravenous ibuprofen versus ketorolac for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing lower abdominal surgery: A randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study.

BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are often used as part of multimodal analgesia to control postoperative pain. This randomized, controlled, double-blinded, non-inferiority study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of intravenous ibuprofen versus ketorolac in children undergoing open unilateral lower abdominal surgery. The authors hypothesized that postoperative analgesia produced by intravenous ibuprofen would be non-inferior to that of intravenous ketorolac. METHODS: Sixty-six children aged 2 to 8 years who were scheduled to undergo unilateral lower abdominal surgery, were recruited. Patients in the ibuprofen group received 10mg/kg/6h intravenous ibuprofen. Patients in the ketorolac group were given 0.5mg/kg/6h intravenous ketorolac. The primary outcome measure was 24-h postoperative morphine consumption. The secondary outcome measures were postoperative pain score, the incidence of early postoperative fever and the incidence of ibuprofen and ketorolac adverse effects including pain during drug infusion, vomiting, epigastric pain and allergic reaction. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients completed the study (30 ibuprofen, 29 ketorolac). There was no significant difference (P=0.305) in the mean (SD) 24-h postoperative morphine consumption (µ/kg) between intravenous ibuprofen, 16.00 (5.31), and ketorolac, 14.65 (4.61). The reported pain scores were similar in both groups. The incidence of postoperative fever was significantly lower (p=0.039) in the ibuprofen group (3%) than the ketorolac group (20%). The incidence of adverse effects was similar in both ibuprofen and ketorolac groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous ibuprofen can be used as an alternative to ketorolac for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing unilateral lower abdominal surgery because both drugs similarly provide safe and effective postoperative analgesia.

Awake proning of a 2-year-old extubated child with severe COVID-19 pneumonitis.

With the progress of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, available data suggest lower complications and disease severity in children and young patients. Despite most paediatric cases being mild in severity, some children require intensive care and mechanical ventilation due to the development of paediatric severe acute respiratory distress. The use of adjuvant therapies in severely ill paediatric patients has not been reported widely in the literature. Prone positioning in spontaneously breathing children has, to our knowledge, not yet been described. In our report, the trachea of a 2-year-old child was intubated, and he was mechanically ventilated for severe bilateral pneumonia. The infant and his mother tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction testing from nasopharyngeal swabs. Immediately after tracheal extubation, the child developed severe respiratory distress and refractory hypoxia. Awake prone position was employed as a rescue therapy for the management of post-extubation hypoxia, resulting in a dramatic improvement in oxygenation. Prone positioning in the paediatric patient may improve oxygenation and can be a useful adjuvant for respiratory therapy either before, during or after invasive mechanical ventilation. Awake prone position may be considered as an option for the management of COVID-19 in paediatric patients, but it requires patient cooperation.